Bacardi - Printable Version +- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site) +-- Forum: Community (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Donor/Staff Abuse Reports (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Donor/Staff Abuse Report Archive (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +---- Thread: Bacardi (/showthread.php?tid=4349) |
RE: Bacardi - BacArdi M. - 04-29-2018 (04-29-2018, 10:56 PM)ReThink Wrote:(04-29-2018, 09:12 PM)BacArdi M. Wrote: Ok, where to begin here. I didn't feel great about killing him after I TPed him, but he T-baited after I brought him, not before. If he'd T-baited before I brought him, I would've let him run off and then gone after him after waiting a while. I didn't feel great about doing it, and it did feel a little sleazy, but the gameplay necessitated it. And frankly, this whole thing kind of seems like manufactured entrapment because he was mad about having his behavior called out and wanted to fault me for something. RE: Bacardi - ReThink - 04-29-2018 (04-29-2018, 11:14 PM)BacArdi M. Wrote: I didn't feel great about killing him after I TPed him, but he T-baited after I brought him, not before. If he'd T-baited before I brought him, I would've let him run off and then gone after him after waiting a while. I didn't feel great about doing it, and it did feel a little sleazy, but the gameplay necessitated it. And frankly, this whole thing kind of seems like manufactured entrapment because he was mad about having his behavior called out and wanted to fault me for something.@BacArdi M. Eh, I wouldn't say entrapment, but it was definitely salt after the fact that compelled him to make this thread. I would bet it wouldn't have been made if it was someone else, but that's just my speculation. And yeah, I made a mistake, he T-baited AFTER the teleport, which invalidates his claim even more. He's trying to correlate two unrelated events that share only a similar timeframe in an attempt to claim abuse, which is pretty shitty imo. But yeah, @nopleez, the teleport is definitely a red herring; you're just upsetti you were shot for doing something KOSable, and are trying to find an excuse to get back at him. RE: Bacardi - BacArdi M. - 04-29-2018 I'd suggest we have a command alternative to !bring which sends a player back to the spawn (note: not respawn them, just put them back where they started). That way, they get unstuck, we can be alive or dead and do it, and it doesn't put us personally in the situation. While I stand behind my actions here, it would make it a lot easier and cleaner. RE: Bacardi - The Dutch Problem - 04-29-2018 Just hoppin in on this, it seems that Nopleez is aiming at that Bacardi should've responded to his quote of being stuck with the simple question: "Do you need a tp, Nopleez?" That way you verify if the player needs a teleport or not. If he doesnt tespond push till you get an answer. I've yet to see nopleez upset about being killed so i myself dont see much salt in this. More of a confusion and good intentions of giving Bacardi a lesson in staffing concerning the !bring command... RE: Bacardi - BacArdi M. - 04-29-2018 (04-29-2018, 11:49 PM)King Tiger Ace Fasda22 Wrote: Just hoppin in on this, it seems that Nopleez is aiming at that Bacardi should've responded to his quote of being stuck with the simple question: "Do you need a tp, Nopleez?" That way you verify if the player needs a teleport or not. If he doesnt tespond push till you get an answer. Noted, and I'll be happy to do that extra step going forward and would be completely fine if it were made part of the procedure for helping stuck players. Usually I do, but I've been stressed and overworked a lot IRL (and IG) lately so just forgot to this time around, and I assumed that a regular like Nopleez wouldn't ask for a teleport unless they were stuck. My issue here is how closely he links it with the muting/gagging for unruly behavior part, as that's what most of his anger seems to be stemming from. That said, I'm now seeing from the demo that I teleported him from being stuck on his own C4, which he otherwise would've defused or run away from had he not been stuck but instead would've blown up on, so I give up. It doesn't seem like he has good intentions of making it a teaching moment for a relatively small event, as he posted this under the guise of "it's time to talk about my abuse of staff commands" when his grievance was this teleporting bullshit and my muting/gagging people who deserved it, including himself. RE: Bacardi - Summer - 04-29-2018 I think there does need to be an alternative to !bring for players, such as the !unstuck command in prophunt, like Bacardi suggested. That way staff won't get caught up in this, but if caught abusing it (such as getting away from a traitor) its slayable/bannable. Edit: I'm an idiot. RE: Bacardi - matt_st3 (Strongrule) - 04-30-2018 King I was telling him the same as you posted that lol But, what I see here is more incorrect handling (didn't determine where stuck) rather than abuse itself Another note, for those wanting to point out previous "abuses" or "history" should make their own abuse thread as 1 nothing is done without proof, and 2 it'd be more appropriate to make a new thread than derail the point of this one RE: Bacardi - DC.Zephyr - 04-30-2018 In my experience; I've seen many people complain about Bacardi, whether it be abuse of commands, general ass-hattery, etc. However, Bacardi is doing what he believes is the right thing to do which I completely agree with. That said, Bacardi, you still need to think what you are doing through before you do it; I myself have fallen victim to not doing that. RE: Bacardi - ReThink - 04-30-2018 (04-29-2018, 11:57 PM)Summer Wrote: I think there does need to be an alternative to !bring for players, such as the !unstuck command in prophunt, like Bacardi suggested. That way staff won't get caught up in this, but if caught abusing it (such as getting away from a traitor) its slayable/bannable. I agree completely. This is a great idea; it puts the burden of proper usage on the player, and makes it so that abuse of such a command would be obvious and clear-cut. Plus it's easier to regulate and create rules for proper usage, and doesn't interrupt flow of gameplay by having a mod do things that could be considered a conflict of interest. It basically puts the ball back in the player's court and forces them to make a proper call, which then a mod can regulate if abused or done improperly. RE: Bacardi - Dildo Shwaggins - 04-30-2018 Seeing the video of the round (guess I wasn't there after all) it seems like a case of a misunderstanding of the "I'm stuck" thing. So, I can see how that would be misinterpreted and I would have brought the player myself. The potential RDM is a bit shaky to say the least, but I can see how one would think to TP from that. So, I'm doubtful this was intentional abuse. |