(09-07-2021, 02:05 AM)Nimble Jack Wrote: Just do reports, even if it seems other staff aren't doing it.

(09-07-2021, 01:08 PM)GAMER Wrote: I just don’t understand why me, an active staff member liked by majority of the community was demoted so quickly solely because of what sounds like to me the complaints of one staff member.
There are a handful of staff that get on once every 3 months for 2 rounds then disappear for another month or so.
Why are are they not demoted?

There's also staff that are just completely inactive.
Why are they not demoted?

I have explained my way of staffing and my thought process behind it. If me not doing every single report is worse and more demanding of a derank than being a staff member that hardly ever plays please help me understand how.

Its not like I do absolutely nothing, i handle slays occasionally and deal with major issues when I'm the only staff online. The one type of report i would always try to handle was T on T rdm because in my opinion that's the only time you should be upset/ annoyed about an rdm.
But
Yalls only argument is “why be staff and not staff” when that’s barely what im trying to argue. I've explained how and why i staff the way i do.

Why was i, an active staff of the lowest rank. Deranked so quickly compared to any other staff member that doesn't play anymore or barely plays at all.

And why has no one expect matt addressed the other things i have said in this thread not pertaining to doing reports?

All this sounds like to me is i got demoted because 1 person (or 2 I really have no idea) out of the thousands of people that play on dinks didn't like the way i did things. As far as i know no one has ever had any issues with me until now and on my first offense i get demoted.

(09-07-2021, 03:28 PM)Doc. Vi Wrote: Even the german gouvernement has less bureaucracy than dinkles gmod

(09-07-2021, 03:13 PM)Nicol Bolas Wrote:

(09-07-2021, 01:08 PM)GAMER Wrote: I just don’t understand why me, an active staff member liked by majority of the community was demoted so quickly solely because of what sounds like to me the complaints of one staff member.
There are a handful of staff that get on once every 3 months for 2 rounds then disappear for another month or so.
Why are are they not demoted?

There's also staff that are just completely inactive.
Why are they not demoted?

I have explained my way of staffing and my thought process behind it. If me not doing every single report is worse and more demanding of a derank than being a staff member that hardly ever plays please help me understand how.

Its not like I do absolutely nothing, i handle slays occasionally and deal with major issues when I'm the only staff online. The one type of report i would always try to handle was T on T rdm because in my opinion that's the only time you should be upset/ annoyed about an rdm.
But
Yalls only argument is “why be staff and not staff” when that’s barely what im trying to argue. I've explained how and why i staff the way i do.

Why was i, an active staff of the lowest rank. Deranked so quickly compared to any other staff member that doesn't play anymore or barely plays at all.

And why has no one expect matt addressed the other things i have said in this thread not pertaining to doing reports?

All this sounds like to me is i got demoted because 1 person (or 2 I really have no idea) out of the thousands of people that play on dinks didn't like the way i did things. As far as i know no one has ever had any issues with me until now and on my first offense i get demoted.

Red: This issue pertains nothing to the argument of demoting inactive staff and any comparison is unneeded. This was a separate issue and if you want to complain about inactive staff members you are more than welcome to create a separate forum thread dedicated to the topic.

Green: I am not sure where you are getting the notion you were demoted because a single staff member complained as this is not true. I, as well as the other admins, received reports from several individuals including other staff members about your lack of staffing. No, I will not name these individuals as I have no obligation to do so for the sake of anonymity. We also noticed the issue numerous times while on the server ourselves as well. You were talked about this numerous times and gave the impression you did not care. Guidelines for demotion were set by our predecessor admins and were followed through with. See here for more information regarding demotion processes. 

Blue: Your method of staffing was not in line with the expectations the Admin team and Dinkleberg set for your given rank. We have an entire guideline document dedicated to setting the proper expectations. Picking and choosing when to do reports based on if people complain or say they are sorry is not within those expectations. It is up to the person who filed the report to forgive, not you. I am not even sure how you handle major issues like you state you do considering you have not submitted a ban request to the forums in over three years. 

(09-07-2021, 06:30 PM)Nimble Jack Wrote: Let the record state that seniority whether in being staff or an active member of the community does not excuse you from demotion or punishment, as shown by the loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong list of members and staff that are no longer with us.

R.I.P