(04-28-2024, 11:17 PM)BIIG_SAD Wrote: -snip

imagine if a staff member A went to player B and said "hey so X server, yeah, lemme know if Y occurs there; im not in that server". That is straightforwards a mole. That is some secret police gestapo shit. That is also gross and unethical.

-snip-

(04-28-2024, 11:45 PM)BIIG_SAD Wrote: -snip-

Alichay. I am pretty sure you are in discords that are outside of dinks. I know almost certainly that you are. Would it not be wrong/gross/creepy if, say, I were to ask a person in your private discord to drag up literally anything to incriminate you and get you banned from dinks/wherever?

yes! this would be fucking creepy and gross and strange. (and probably illegal to boot for some kind of internet harassment and stalking law.)(also, fucking yuck)

-snip-

But it is not your nor my place to create essentially secret police to investigate people we don't agree with for the purpose of banning them from a community for trumped up allegations, is it?

obviously, yes. report illegal shit like p*dos. they deserve punishment. but like, Someone said a bad word in a place that isn't Dinks by a far shot? nah.

The meme below is the reason for my post, but I better add some input so my shit dose not get removed.

Staffing on multiple servers is not a problem. no one owes the community anything. There is some genuine feedback mixed in that I agree with, people are overly sensitive to common words and terms, intention should always be taken into account over the use of a word all together, this is so much less effort for everyone as well.

I don't like the way this is being presented, the best way to deal with a problem from someone is to take it on one subject at a time. Putting it all into this long ass post has me questioning the actual intention behind something like this, it's hard to address and even harder to come to a conclusion all party's can be happy with and is the reason why it is hard to look at something like this and not see it as a attack. anyway i'm not staff anymore, shut the fuck up.

1. Prior to you posting, I was told that it was Bryan and not you that mistakenly changed the perms for the guidelines, as soon as I found out I posted a disclaimer and struck through your name and replaced it with Bryan's. My bad.
   
2. As far as you looking into the people behind the changing of the guidelines, how are five people sitting in a call instantly guilty for one or two editing the guidelines. Also your hyperlink on 'throwing guilt" is literally jack giving you as much information as possible to avoid the claim that he had something to do with it, dude's saving his ass because he's talking to an admin who already think's he's guilty. 
   
3. "It's not my fault that so much rule breaking happens in there, and I'm sorry for having the gall to not simply ignore it happening so blatantly." What rule breaking are you referring to and who's responsibility is it to be a mandated reporter of all dinkle-rule breaking. The entire point is that separate discords are completely autonomous from Dinkleberg's Servers and that 'evidence' from those discords should not be used against players-- of course there are important exceptions. 
   
   
4. "The "two" accounts you're referring to are the same account." They are not "It's weird that you think private servers can't be used as evidence, but think they should be used to personally ask for unbans to circumvent the regular appeal procedure." No, it's weird that you falsely banned my alt account and then instead of just unbanning it once shown evidence you asked me to take it to the forums. Also, the reason that specific account has not shown up among my other alts is because I now know how to get around the alt checker and that account was one of the first to test if it worked, it did. 
   
   
5. "I said it was a bad look for potential staff to not mention rule breaking that they were directly informed about, and that reporting it would have been an easy way to build trust and show that they can be unbiased" "If you leak private discords to me I'll trust you more and if you don't that's a bad look for you!"
   
   
6. The smurfy situation and the slur situation are one in the same.
   
   
7. You use evidence gathered from Shenanigans in order to ban people. You also repeatedly DM'd anyone you could reaching out to find more information on the topic. 
   
   
8. "This was proven correct when information about the victims was leaked and someone was harassed as a result" Kinda crazy this harassment isn't talked about more, especially when no one harassed anyone about the situation?
   
   
9. It is utterly devoid of evidence, however, those claims were made by people very close to you regardless. 
   
   
10. The Wall of Shame might have started as a way for victims to come forward about their actions but apparently it did not stay that way forever. It was not barred to only women. The difference between you and I is that I only asked for evidence and clarification from various parties to make this post, you were just generally collecting it -- Purposefully asking people to gather. The only evidence I personally sought out was for the existence of this Wall of Shame.
    
    
11. If I recall correctly, there were three active discord staff members, one of which being you. All of you refused to stop the actively devolving situation. Slow mode takes less effort than making small talk. Again, you're an admin. We are supposed to hold you in a higher regard.
    
    
12. "I'm struggling to see how this is at all relevant or anything other than you reaching for any semblance of "evidence" you can possibly fabricate." You're an admin, you should know how your server works.
    
    
13. "You have also once again demonstrated that you have no issue with sending someone from your clique to another server for the purposes of spying and leaking." No one from 'our clique' sent her, she was in there before I even knew of the server's existence. Also, spying and leaking is wild on this because it is a public discord server of a public TTT server! It's the main home page, not a text chat. 
    

(04-29-2024, 07:36 AM)Chris Farley Wrote: I won’t comment much about the doc, but I think one of the biggest issues is that I know of very few that DO trust Tiefling as an admin. I have discussed this topic with several regulars and other staff members; even Prop Hunt staff. Outside of her friends, not one has told me they trust Tiefling. [...] the lack of trust by a huge margin of the community is something to look into.