Your Dad's second ban appeal - Printable Version

Your Dad's second ban appeal - Printable Version

+- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site)
+-- Forum: Trouble in Terrorist Town (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: TTT Appeals (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: TTT Appeals Archive (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=47)
+---- Thread: Your Dad's second ban appeal (/showthread.php?tid=19978)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - 3mb3ry - 12-10-2024

gonna be honest, i dont think youre getting unbanned

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - 茶 Tea - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:37 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:33 PM)Damien Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:27 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: ok

v relevant to the topic at hand

n e waze

while I don't agree that your dad should be remaining of a ban, I understand the replies here aren't helping his case. However, I don't think he should have been permanently banned, nor should a community that's lead by a sexual deviant come into play in ours. I think this also calls into question what merit other community bans have if all we can see is the bans themselves, and not the evidence presented. And also hearsay "I think he's transphobic" type messages without substantiated proof (such as what @Damien says here) aren't helpful either. I think for that kind of insinuation there should be hard evidence.
Imagine typing irrelevant posts directed towards someone and when that someone replies back with posts (that are admittedly unrelated to the post and irrelevant) you cry about irrelevance to the thread when you derailed it. typical oinker argument

I'm going to automatically assume that someone is a transphobe when 1, they say transphobic things, and 2, they are being defended by a transphobe. Pretty safe bet that Your Dad is a transphobe lmao.

okay I'm going to automatically assume you're anti-semitic because you hate jewish people because you've said mean things about me.

if he said antisemitic things to you, would it make him not antisemitic just cause you're a piece of shit? food for thought

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - An Actual Jewish Person - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:38 PM)Damien Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:37 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: okay I'm going to automatically assume you're anti-semitic because you hate jewish people because you've said mean things about me.
You have active warnings for transphobia

Yes I said some edgy jokes I shouldn't have and got warned for them. That's what happens. I don't hide that fact that I said some off collar jokes that I shouldn't have. I haven't said anything like that since, hence, the warnings and rules were enforced and I follow them. Crazy, right? Like there's rules, that we want to have, and then, people who enforce the rules that we live by when things go wrong? Weird, weird

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - Your Dad - 12-10-2024

I am not a transphobe.

Now queue all the doctored screenshots that are completely irrelevant to this ban appeal from everyone who is friends with the admins that are shit slinging in this thread. Specifically from users that have completely ignored this thread until just now.

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - An Actual Jewish Person - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:39 PM)茶 Tea Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:37 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:33 PM)Damien Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:27 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: ok

v relevant to the topic at hand

n e waze

while I don't agree that your dad should be remaining of a ban, I understand the replies here aren't helping his case. However, I don't think he should have been permanently banned, nor should a community that's lead by a sexual deviant come into play in ours. I think this also calls into question what merit other community bans have if all we can see is the bans themselves, and not the evidence presented. And also hearsay "I think he's transphobic" type messages without substantiated proof (such as what @Damien says here) aren't helpful either. I think for that kind of insinuation there should be hard evidence.
Imagine typing irrelevant posts directed towards someone and when that someone replies back with posts (that are admittedly unrelated to the post and irrelevant) you cry about irrelevance to the thread when you derailed it. typical oinker argument

I'm going to automatically assume that someone is a transphobe when 1, they say transphobic things, and 2, they are being defended by a transphobe. Pretty safe bet that Your Dad is a transphobe lmao.

okay I'm going to automatically assume you're anti-semitic because you hate jewish people because you've said mean things about me.
if he said antisemitic things to you, would it make him not antisemitic just cause you're a piece of shit? food for thought

idk if this is an anti-semitism thing or you hate cops thing but I genuinely have no idea who you are or why you're mad at me. I don't think I've even played TTT with you or know your name

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - Damien - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:40 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: I don't hide that fact that I said some off collar jokes that I shouldn't have.

"some off collar jokes" and it's telling a trans woman to "use her man voice" because you're arguing with her lmao, you're fucking wild for downplaying this

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - 茶 Tea - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:41 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:39 PM)茶 Tea Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:37 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:33 PM)Damien Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:27 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: ok

v relevant to the topic at hand

n e waze

while I don't agree that your dad should be remaining of a ban, I understand the replies here aren't helping his case. However, I don't think he should have been permanently banned, nor should a community that's lead by a sexual deviant come into play in ours. I think this also calls into question what merit other community bans have if all we can see is the bans themselves, and not the evidence presented. And also hearsay "I think he's transphobic" type messages without substantiated proof (such as what @Damien says here) aren't helpful either. I think for that kind of insinuation there should be hard evidence.
Imagine typing irrelevant posts directed towards someone and when that someone replies back with posts (that are admittedly unrelated to the post and irrelevant) you cry about irrelevance to the thread when you derailed it. typical oinker argument

I'm going to automatically assume that someone is a transphobe when 1, they say transphobic things, and 2, they are being defended by a transphobe. Pretty safe bet that Your Dad is a transphobe lmao.

okay I'm going to automatically assume you're anti-semitic because you hate jewish people because you've said mean things about me.
if he said antisemitic things to you, would it make him not antisemitic just cause you're a piece of shit? food for thought

idk if this is an anti-semitism thing or you hate cops thing but I genuinely have no idea who you are or why you're mad at me. I don't think I've even played TTT with you or know your name

i just know about your racist posts on other servers as well as your various ists and isms on this one.

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - An Actual Jewish Person - 12-10-2024

(12-10-2024, 11:42 PM)Damien Wrote:
(12-10-2024, 11:40 PM)An Actual Jewish Person Wrote: I don't hide that fact that I said some off collar jokes that I shouldn't have.
"some off collar jokes" and it's telling a trans woman to "use her man voice" because you're arguing with her lmao, you're fucking wild for downplaying this

[Image: ee7d5b145185aa27d3f48626177daf66.jpg]

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - chibill - 12-10-2024

This is getting out of hand, will will make a decision when we do.

RE: Your Dad's second ban appeal - TDawg4 - 12-12-2024

Your ban appeal has been denied for multiple reasons. First you told us you were ban evading. Second we followed up on your accusation, everyone shown in that screen shot and all 4 individuals are according to them 18+/was a closed channel (if you have more info feel free to dm me).

Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, for the purposes of this appeal you have and seem to continue to treat members of various communities extremely poorly and have been unable to even say a token sorry or that you won't do it again for any of your behavior. Either it is "exaggerated" "just jokes" or even "fabricated." Every single response you made (go back and read them) included some kind of deflection from the issue being addressed.

Reappeal date 2/12/2025. Again I encourage you to reflect on how you treat people because clearly there is some kind of disconnect.