Ummmmm - Printable Version +- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site) +-- Forum: Community (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Community Discussion (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Ummmmm (/showthread.php?tid=1387) Pages:
1
2
|
Ummmmm - tjs65 - 04-17-2017 I don't wan't to start anything, but I've been gone for about a week. What the hell happened to the man what to eat that fruit? Just curious RE: Ummmmm - Mr_Rippe - 04-17-2017 The BANTZ people got banned for being massive cunts. RE: Ummmmm - Foxka - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 08:44 PM)tjs65 Wrote: I don't wan't to start anything, but I've been gone for about a week. What the hell happened to the man what to eat that fruit? Just curiousRead the thread in staff abuse section. Basically he's been a mingey troll, but that is only my opinion. RE: Ummmmm - ~$$~ BlackCatTheGreat ♣♣ - 04-17-2017 Got banned for carrying out a healthy debate for a bit to long and the Gestapo had to parental block them. RE: Ummmmm - StaleWater - 04-17-2017 He was permanent banned and so was more handsome than you and browsing because they disagreed on something and them not agreeing caused the ban RE: Ummmmm - reed1103 - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 09:19 PM)⌠ƒ€ѦГ⌡StaleWater Wrote: He was permanent banned and so was more handsome than you and browsing because they disagreed on something and them not agreeing caused the ban You forgot danUK RE: Ummmmm - donkeyskin1 - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 09:27 PM)reed1103 Wrote:(04-17-2017, 09:19 PM)⌠ƒ€ѦГ⌡StaleWater Wrote: He was permanent banned and so was more handsome than you and browsing because they disagreed on something and them not agreeing caused the ban He didn't really do much RE: Ummmmm - StaleWater - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 09:27 PM)reed1103 Wrote:(04-17-2017, 09:19 PM)⌠ƒ€ѦГ⌡StaleWater Wrote: He was permanent banned and so was more handsome than you and browsing because they disagreed on something and them not agreeing caused the ban W A I T what why was Dan banned he didn't even do anything really RE: Ummmmm - RussEfarmer - 04-17-2017 (04-17-2017, 09:35 PM)⌠ƒ€ѦГ⌡StaleWater Wrote:(04-17-2017, 09:27 PM)reed1103 Wrote:(04-17-2017, 09:19 PM)⌠ƒ€ѦГ⌡StaleWater Wrote: He was permanent banned and so was more handsome than you and browsing because they disagreed on something and them not agreeing caused the ban Dan was hardly involved, just defended a few things, nothing major to warrant a ban, maybe a warning. RE: Ummmmm - ❤ Miss Mari ❤ - 04-17-2017 They did nothing wrong? well attacking other members of the community isnt wrong apparently? no, this is not everything they did, they have been harassing and grouping up on members long before this, and they didnt just have an opinion, they attacked the staff repeatedly, and got very immature about it, same with russ. They did a lot more than just this. |