+- Dinkleberg's GMod (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site)
+-- Forum: Prop Hunt (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: PH Suggestions & Help (https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: About App Responses (/showthread.php?tid=2645)
Pages:
1
2
About App Responses - Tronald - 08-23-2017
something i want to say is that i think if theres an app that is doomed, dont just write negative comments, give them advice so that they know what to do if they want to become staff in the future.
for example in my first staff app people said i was immature and thats why i wasn't getting staff. i worked on this and now look where I am.
(and no this isn't just salt)
RE: About App Responses - Generally_Suspicious - 08-23-2017
+111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
"No" is not a valid response. I could be wrong, and i'll see if I can find it. But i'm pretty sure we've already had an entire discussion or rules written or something on this matter. Yet a lot of people, mostly staff, ignore the actual fuck out of the point of an application response.
http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-2116.html
The quiche ( I guess it's queef now?) has spoken. This should either be a non-issue or Warning Levels should be raised. High staff FOR NO REASON should be exempt from this.
Or any other rule, for that matter.
RE: About App Responses - polaroid - 08-23-2017
Makes sense, but apps responses, in my opinion, should really contain advice in them regardless of the previous comments.
RE: About App Responses - DaKody - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 06:22 PM)SusAF Wrote: +111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
"No" is not a valid response. I could be wrong, and i'll see if I can find it. But i'm pretty sure we've already had an entire discussion or rules written or something on this matter. Yet a lot of people, mostly staff, ignore the actual fuck out of the point of an application response.
http://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/thread-2116.html
The quiche ( I guess it's queef now?) has spoken. This should either be a non-issue or Warning Levels should be raised. High staff FOR NO REASON should be exempt from this.
Or any other rule, for that matter.
no
RE: About App Responses - Foxka - 08-23-2017
why do people insist on making threads about things that have already been resolved and addressed
RE: About App Responses - Generally_Suspicious - 08-23-2017
@Foxka Because it's still a reoccurring problem despite the fact and clearly is a topic we need to bring to the communities attention.
@DaKody No staff shouldn't be held to the same standards in place of server rules? Or just no to be snide and not inputting anything constructive to the conversation? Elaborate.
RE: About App Responses - DaKody - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 07:05 PM)SusAF Wrote: @Foxka Because it's still a reoccurring problem despite the fact and clearly is a topic we need to bring to the communities attention.
@DaKody No staff shouldn't be held to the same standards in place of server rules? Or just no to be snide and not inputting anything constructive to the conversation? Elaborate.
no
RE: About App Responses - Generally_Suspicious - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 07:12 PM)DaKody Wrote:(08-23-2017, 07:05 PM)SusAF Wrote: @Foxka Because it's still a reoccurring problem despite the fact and clearly is a topic we need to bring to the communities attention.
@DaKody No staff shouldn't be held to the same standards in place of server rules? Or just no to be snide and not inputting anything constructive to the conversation? Elaborate.
no
I appreciate your dedication to the bit, frankly.
RE: About App Responses - Linfalas - 08-23-2017
How many threads about this has been made?
RE: About App Responses - [green][AC] Assassin Desorito - 08-24-2017
The thing is, you never would have brought up the topic if it wasn't your app. And no one just said 'No'. Everyone gave reasons and you can improve on what those reasons were about. That's what the reasons are for. It lets the applicant know why someone thinks they should or shouldn't get the position. But yes, this was already brought into light by queef. So this really wasn't necessary. I understand where you are coming from, though.