(03-01-2017, 10:15 PM)thedevilcries Wrote: Didnt know where to put this but someone damaged me and when i killed them for damaging me someone else killed me i called it out in voice coms but a lot of people were talking i have been slayed for this exact same thing before and told its because he had a reason to kill the other person even if i didnt see it, so i took the slay but then rhapsody took the report and didnt slay him and told me it was because he didnt see the person crowbar me first. If this falls into a grey area I would perfer its fixed so it doesnt happen to someone else because as ive said before and this only cements my point i feel as if the staff are against me on this server.

(03-01-2017, 10:17 PM)❤ Miss Mari â¤ Wrote:

(03-01-2017, 10:15 PM)thedevilcries Wrote: Didnt know where to put this but someone damaged me and when i killed them for damaging me someone else killed me i called it out in voice coms but a lot of people were talking i have been slayed for this exact same thing before and told its because he had a reason to kill the other person even if i didnt see it, so i took the slay but then rhapsody took the report and didnt slay him and told me it was because he didnt see the person crowbar me first. If this falls into a grey area I would perfer its fixed so it doesnt happen to someone else because as ive said before and this only cements my point i feel as if the staff are against me on this server.

If someone had a valid reason to kill someone, and you kill that person and they report you for rdm, it is a slay. Also the staff arent against you silly lol. So dont feel like it was biased or anything ^^

(03-01-2017, 10:27 PM)Rhapsody Wrote: This is in the wrong section, it should be here or here. Regardless, I'll respond, since I'm the staff member that handled the report you made.

There was no way for him to have seen Visson crowbarring you, given Bob Saget's position in the death scene. I've recorded it from your angle and from his angle to show that this is the case; there was no direct line of sight. While he did shoot you for defending yourself, this was information he was lacking and that you could've attempted to provide while being shot (assuming you didn't). This is not his fault, since given his position there's no way he could've obtained this information and not felt like he was in danger. You've told me that another staff member has slain you for a similar situation, but there's nothing addressing a situation like this one in the rules, which I believe leaves it to staff discretion. I'm of the opinion that if someone couldn't possibly have information regarding a certain situation, they shouldn't be slain for it, as this is a failure on the part of the person who defended themselves. I am consistent in enforcing it this way.

Here's the video in question;