[Gabe]

Even tho the opinion "Yes" won it was still under 50%, so you do have a point there. Renzo did do the right thing by calling the vote & vote for the map but normally you aren't suppose to change the map like Christian said. The only times I've done votes to change maps were maps like ttt_outpost_v1 (forgot the name it's close enough, whatever.) where the playermodels t pose, half the people were invisible for most people, and basically everyone complaining, etc. the vote was more like 70% there.

But, I do think this should be more of a lesson/realization rather than a punishment.

ok

[lacer]

Even tho the opinion "Yes" won it was still under 50%, so you do have a point there. Renzo did do the right thing by calling the vote & vote for the map but normally you aren't suppose to change the map like Christian said. The only times I've done votes to change maps were maps like ttt_outpost_v1 (forgot the name it's close enough, whatever.) where the playermodels t pose, half the people were invisible for most people, and basically everyone complaining, etc. the vote was more like 70% there.

But, I do think this should be more of a lesson/realization rather than a punishment.

ok

ok

[Trombowen]

I mean I wasn't intending for this post to be a call for punishment; my main goal for this was to set a precedent, so this wouldn't happen again.

[matt_st3 (Strongrule)]

The only reason a votemap should be called is for maps impacting the server connection and stability.

[Dildo Shwaggins]

Yeah, I think this is more of a "don't do it again" sort of thing, I don't think the intention was to be abusive. But unless the map is broken it's best to play it out

[matt_st3 (Strongrule)]

Agreed. These tools exist to moderate the server problems, not change bc people are unhappy with the maps. Make a removal suggestion thread or just don’t vote for it