[tiefling lesbian]

I definitely agree that three admins is the ideal amount, a tiebreaker in situations is absolutely needed

I'm not a huge fan of this way of thinking, because I don't think there should be any administrative decisions that result in them "technically" coming to an agreement because it's 2 v 1. With two admins, the decision making process is— admin 1 makes a suggestion and admin 2 agrees or disagrees, then admin 1 either goes with admin 2's decision or they discuss it until they can agree on a course of action. It'd be inaccurate to assume that an admin can have an idea shot down purely because they're outnumbered, because you would ideally be using the same process with any number of admins.

to me it's less about outnumbering and more just adding a 3rd perspective to make it easier to settle on an agreement, and i agree that ideally it shouldn't have to come down to just numbers, but i think there are those times when people just can't agree on something and the fairest course of action would be to bring it to a vote, especially if the decision involves some form of status quo in which not reaching an agreement would mean one side getting their way by default
editing to clarify that i still don't think a decision should be able to be forced just by numbers, taking it to a vote should be a mutual agreement between everyone involved unless it's something truly urgent