[angel]

I definitely agree that three admins is the ideal amount. A tiebreaker in situations is absolutely needed

I'm not a huge fan of this way of thinking, because I don't think there should be any administrative decisions that result in them "technically" coming to an agreement because it's 2 v 1. With two admins, the decision making process is— admin 1 makes a suggestion and admin 2 agrees or disagrees, then admin 1 either goes with admin 2's decision or they discuss it until they can agree on a course of action. It'd be inaccurate to assume that an admin can have an idea shot down purely because they're outnumbered, because you would ideally be using the same process with any number of admins.

I may not have worded that right, my apologies. I also meant it as a third opinion to help come to a decision in times where they can't come to a unanimous agreement and just in general would be nice 

I absolutely disagree with it becoming a 2v1 situation by just tossing the other's idea/opinions out the window due to being outnumbered and hope that it doesn't come to that. 

I believe that regardless of the third opinion, the other's thoughts should be looked at and discussed until all three of them can come to that agreement between each other, should Tiefling be promoted. It should absolutely be working with each other, not against in any situation. 

I trust that it would stay the way it is now. I don't feel that adding another admin would steer it in a bad direction at all, and instead, I believe that it would aid in bettering the server and the decisions being made to do so.