06-13-2017, 05:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2017, 05:41 PM by HiddenBlade.)
(06-13-2017, 03:57 PM)Dildo Shwaggins Wrote:If a rule like this is not in discussion, then Dagger is definitely in the wrong. Also, the mere thought of having a rule like that is preposterous considering you don't know why the person left that afk alive without actually witnessing it yourself. Perhaps someone walked in on the afk killing, engaged the traitor, and either killed the traitor or the traitor had to flee. However, telling a reportee not to check the motd for the rules to see if it was rule breaking is very evasive and very troubling(06-13-2017, 03:17 PM)Christian Wrote: I helped Shinya out with the report regarding you killing Dagger, we determined it was NOT RDM because ACE was proven and was killed during their fire fight.
Dagger has been very heated recently, I've notified the Admins about the matter for they will want to look at this. What worries me is this quote:
"He claimed it was a new rule that you were discussing, so he said not to bother checking the !motd which I did"
This is something he's done a long time ago with making up his own rules, this is quite worrysome to me. Especially since his return to the Staff Position.
This is exactly what is alarming. You were sus for being AFK around a bunch of UNIDed bodies while AFK and AFKs can be killed regardless on overtime. But no new rules to my knowledge are being discussed so that is concerning