06-16-2017, 01:45 PM
>"The way you describe it says he was a fair distance from any edge, and if a traitor is KOSed it should be assumed that they are very dangerous. At the very least, it was a huge lapse in judgment for you to go the tedious route and shove him off rather than shoot him then and there."
All I'm hearing are "should"s and "should have"s. But these are more of a common sense or suggestions involving what I should do if I wanted to win or kill the people I should. None of what you're saying is from a, for lack of a better word, legal perspective. As in, interpreting the rules and how they apply to the situation.
>"There are many maps where pushing someone off the map results in their body being unidentifiable (other than a detective's binoculars). If that was the case, it would be quite suspicious as well. Why push him to a location that you couldn't even check if he was a traitor or not?"
It was not. I don't know the map name, but he fell to his death and was able to be identified.
>"If I board a plane to Egypt in the middle of my traitor round, am I not AFK? Regardless of his traitor status, he was AFK and no reason was given for the KOS."
Now this part I just can't agree with. By this logic, if a traitor kills several people then goes AFK but someone still knows the traitor did this, then they still can't be killed because they are AFK. I'm not going to wait for a traitor to return to kill them.
Also, like I said, 10 meters might probably be a good estimate of the distance, maybe less, but keep in mind I used a discomboulator on him, and had the assistance of another person so it only took a good 10 seconds to do this.
All I'm hearing are "should"s and "should have"s. But these are more of a common sense or suggestions involving what I should do if I wanted to win or kill the people I should. None of what you're saying is from a, for lack of a better word, legal perspective. As in, interpreting the rules and how they apply to the situation.
>"There are many maps where pushing someone off the map results in their body being unidentifiable (other than a detective's binoculars). If that was the case, it would be quite suspicious as well. Why push him to a location that you couldn't even check if he was a traitor or not?"
It was not. I don't know the map name, but he fell to his death and was able to be identified.
>"If I board a plane to Egypt in the middle of my traitor round, am I not AFK? Regardless of his traitor status, he was AFK and no reason was given for the KOS."
Now this part I just can't agree with. By this logic, if a traitor kills several people then goes AFK but someone still knows the traitor did this, then they still can't be killed because they are AFK. I'm not going to wait for a traitor to return to kill them.
Also, like I said, 10 meters might probably be a good estimate of the distance, maybe less, but keep in mind I used a discomboulator on him, and had the assistance of another person so it only took a good 10 seconds to do this.
