Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clarify Rules Wording.
#16
(06-16-2017, 07:18 PM)Connar Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:17 PM)Crylo Ren Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:14 PM)Connar Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:07 PM)Crylo Ren Wrote:
(06-16-2017, 07:04 PM)Connar Wrote: Pretty sure it was settled that both of them could have killed each other.

You're the perfect example of what I'm not asking. I don't care about that anymore, I got my answer. I'm now (based off the answers) asking for the rule(s) to be reworded to reflect this so there isn't anymore confusion (considering I got VERY mixed answers/reasons from people. You're bringing in questions I asked in other threads, that aren't what I'm addressing here. Yes, they relate, but no, I'm not asking that question again. I'm asking for action, based off a question's answer.

You fuckin asked for it to be reworded on your last thread as well

Yes, and then if you read this full thread, as well as previous replies, I was told to bring it here, and it's already been confirmed I'm taking the correct path of action. So please, before you give me a major scale panic attack, stop harrasing me for trying to get a solution. Instead, could you look at the issue I brought up here and try addressing it?

Well I mean I can't address it

Also dang bro chill out no need for a panic attack over the addition of an asterisk in the rules for a video game

At this point, I'm not upset about the kill, or the rule, I'm frustrated noone is addresing my question, and are twisting what I'm trying to say, and that everyone decides to jump the band wagon instead of reading what I said, and trying to even see what I'm bringing up.

(06-16-2017, 07:26 PM)Bright Osemwegie Wrote: It already is settled because up until this point nobody had any problems dealing with the rule as it is worded already. They don't need to change the rule because one person decided to take it to its literal extreme. We don't need to go to the absolute perfect detail with regards to rules.

If you read my thread, you would understand i wanted it reworded in MOTD, not changed, to avoid confusion. Where is the issue in this? If you want I'll post how it would be worded to reflect how the rule works (since it's wording is very ambigious, and if you read just the rule, it would seem to allow you to stand on a body without IDing and not be KOSed, which is not the case)


Messages In This Thread
Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 06:52 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Scoovie - 06-16-2017, 06:52 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:01 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Connar - 06-16-2017, 07:04 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:07 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Connar - 06-16-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:17 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Connar - 06-16-2017, 07:18 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:26 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Burrito Bowl - 06-16-2017, 07:09 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:11 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Foxka - 06-16-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:25 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Bright Osemwegie - 06-16-2017, 07:26 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:38 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Burrito Bowl - 06-16-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by Crylo Ren - 06-16-2017, 08:12 PM
RE: Clarify Rules Wording. - by DaKody #FauxOwner - 06-16-2017, 08:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

About Us
    This is Dinkleberg's GMod, a gaming community based in Garry's Mod. We have a Trouble in Terrorist Town, Prop Hunt, Murder, and Deathrun Server. Come check them out sometime.