[chapman]

I have changed my vote to a -1 for this application due to your wording in responses to others with critiques. You were quite respectful towards me despite having stated that you don't like me in the past which I appreciate; however, from observing the direction this thread has gone since I last looked at it, it has caused me to question my opinion that you would be adequate (at this point in time).


I know I don't play the game, so my opinion has little to no bearing on this, but I really agree with Noire. When you're in a position of power (in any context), you have to be willing to meet people halfway as a way to make the server a fully inclusive environment. I have lack of trust in your ability to handle criticism, which makes me think that you'll get this position and resign again in 2 months' time due to a similar circumstance as the prior resignation.


Just for clarification, if it's something that isn't worth being considered responded to professionally, sure, I don't mind an unprofessional response; however, what I had an issue with was the doubling down approach that several others had mentioned. Also, with how not everyone understands that Panda is mostly sarcastic, if you're not familiar with him, it's easy to misinterpret the text as being serious despite his usage of verbal irony.

Take the comments that folks have said that are NOT in your favor and work on those things and reapply in a month.

Best of luck to you.