[chapman]

How is pointing out that slash is not inactive unprofessional??

For the rest again show proof of obvious showcasing bias because people saying stuff without any kind of evidence is frustrating at this point.We need more than words

Norm, allow me to answer your questions.


1. The notion of pointing out that someone is incorrect in itself is not unprofessional, but the manner of how it was delivered was my issue. All that would be needed to prevent said problem would be the added sentence of: Hey, Foxka, I appreciate your concern, but here is a record of Slash's recent message history. Simply putting a screenshot with no words seems to be a petty way to undermine someone's argument. Don't get me wrong, Foxka's take was baseless. 


2. I understand your frustration with the 2nd point. I wish I had the evidence, but to be completely transparent, I was told by a third party about said incident, and as a result, I have no evidence to provide; therefore, if all I have are words, then that's all I have. 


From my interactions with Slash, I think that it's a minor issue, but I still felt like it was enough to hold back from being mod which is why I brought it up.

As a result, I will change my position from a -1 to neutrality. Without evidence, my claim also looks baseless.

TL/DR: I don't care enough to scurry through messages to find the evidence myself and simply wanted to point out a potential issue.