[Damien]

ok

v relevant to the topic at hand

n  e waze

while I don't agree that your dad should be remaining of a ban, I understand the replies here aren't helping his case. However, I don't think he should have been permanently banned, nor should a community that's lead by a sexual deviant come into play in ours. I think this also calls into question what merit other community bans have if all we can see is the bans themselves, and not the evidence presented. And also hearsay "I think he's transphobic" type messages without substantiated proof (such as what @Damien says here) aren't helpful either. I think for that kind of insinuation there should be hard evidence.

Imagine typing irrelevant posts directed towards someone and when that someone replies back with posts (that are admittedly unrelated to the post and irrelevant) you cry about irrelevance to the thread when you derailed it. typical oinker argument

I'm going to automatically assume that someone is a transphobe when 1, they say transphobic things, and 2, they are being defended by a transphobe. Pretty safe bet that Your Dad is a transphobe lmao.