This one month thing is new, I'll keep that in mind... That being said, +1. He's very helpful, knowledgeable and so far seems like a good guy. I feel as if he'd be able to provide great help to the staff. I'd also like to discuss the one month thing a little later. I think we should potentially look at staff candidates who have had previous staff experience on a case by case basis. You know, if they're not terrible, they're helpful, friendly, yadda yadda yadda... I digress. +1 for the reasons stated above
Edit: Thanks Petals. I guess the month of community time is a requirement. I must have forgotten about that.
Edit: Thanks Petals. I guess the month of community time is a requirement. I must have forgotten about that.