[nopleez]

To answer Nopleez, simple. If an RDM'er comes up, shoots me, I deagle him in the face but you only see me deagling him in the face, and you shoot me. You'll get slain, why? I defended myself. I killed an Innocent who did a KOS'able act, damaging me, and as such you do not have the right to immedietly open fire on me as per the Self-Defense rule.

Self-Defense is a rule that overrules alot of the standard problems. While yes Traitors can lie about it, it is again simple. You cannot kill people on suspicion that they're lieing. Because that is killing on Suspicion, wich is as we all know RDM, if this happens before Overtime. Thats why the Innocents have to remain vigilant. And if they do not know the full situation of a firefight, they have little to no right to interveine in said firefight untill KOS's are called etc.

My point still stands. If a player sees a person killing another player and does not witness the self defense aspect then they have every right to kill that player. The player has performed a KOSable act, meaning they can be killed.

This is similar to a player claiming they are proven. If a player says "I'm proven innocent" do I just have to believe them? If they actually did test and were proven through a map based tester (Community pool) and I was not present, there is no way for me to know whether they are telling the truth or not. Should I be slain for this sort of incident as well?

The core gameplay mechanics of TTT involve lying and deception. If a player is forced to believe that someone was defending themself because that person said so then that takes away a huge aspect of TTT. Slaying players for playing the game the way it was meant to be played is not good.