05-15-2018, 07:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-15-2018, 07:28 PM by The Dutch Problem.)
Yes and my point is, Nopleez, that just one person killing the other person while you are not aware of the full situation does not immedietly warrant the death of the survivor of the two, only because you suspect he is lieing.
Also I forgot to address the proven point you made. If one induvidual was proven on the map tester (AKA no direct proof that he was proven by the tester), staff will often ask around if the person claiming to be proven was this. If no-one can support the claim, the claim is dismissed as there is absolutely 0 way of knowing the person was or wasn't fully proven.
The point I made in that post about Proven A and Innocent A was, poorly made and that's my fault. So my apologies for that.
Also I forgot to address the proven point you made. If one induvidual was proven on the map tester (AKA no direct proof that he was proven by the tester), staff will often ask around if the person claiming to be proven was this. If no-one can support the claim, the claim is dismissed as there is absolutely 0 way of knowing the person was or wasn't fully proven.
The point I made in that post about Proven A and Innocent A was, poorly made and that's my fault. So my apologies for that.
Resigned Staff since 03-26-2018.
