08-25-2019, 04:30 PM
(08-25-2019, 04:17 PM)Penguinslayer4 Wrote:(08-25-2019, 04:04 PM)§6SEMBER_UNO Wrote: Queef made the post thus "evidence" was gathered on him. It wasn't specifically to put him on blast but to point out the hypocrisy among staff standards specifically in the TTT community. As a whole TTT is toxic and more often than not this toxicity is birth from staff. It's about respect and as far as I can see there is very little of that. Jokingly calling players gay is the norm, staff literally invite a trolling atmosphere through their conduct.
Y'all seem to keep glossing over and ignoring this section here:
"Besides the evidence of toxicity here there is more that cannot be shown. Some evidence involves users who we hoped to keep anonymous to Protect them from backlash."
This is literally stating this isn't the only shit that happened that lead them to this decision. And this backlash towards them is exactly why they can't show everything cause y'all would do the same thing to those who talked to the admins about these users. If you haven't been someone who's been targeted or harassed it's harder to understand why they came to this decision due to not understanding the severity of the situation. You don't notice all the times an admin has to post someone response to a staff app or an unban request cause someone who's being targeted by someone is scared they will be ganged up on, as was proven by the section where Avi was ganged up on for having an opinion different than theirs. Normally people don't notice the harassment or targeting unless someone shows you or you are the target.
Also, part of the people who got a community ban were staff, it wasn't just users.
And I'm not saying admins shouldn't be held to the same standard as players and lower ranked staff. I'm saying you need to look at the big picture and actually look at the whole post instead of just the parts you don't like.
Okay, so ban someone for ganging up on someone else on that decision and say that's why the person was banned if that's the real reason instead of reaping someone's personal discord for the "evidence" shown here. I'd rather see the admins say "hey, we banned person or people for ganging up on a person and for both parties' protection, we're not showing the full extent" than "Here's some random screenshots of these people talking shit on a personal discord, that's your evidence"