[Mother Nuru.]

Offender's Name:  TheUltraFish

Offender's SteamID:  STEAM_0:0:166097214

Offender's Rank:  Admin

What They Did: Constantly bans players on lack of proof

When They Did It: Throughout his administration time.

Potential Witnesses: 

Proof:  In this thread https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/Thr...eo-Hacking a person reports a player for hacking. The evidence is 40 seconds and the 'hacker' uses a tube launcher? The person reporting him states he saw the banana, however, that is a huge assumption. Instead of asking for more proof, UltraFish bans the player.
There are two videos here, the second one is 3 minutes long and very much shows enough evidence for hacking.
https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/Thr...DoS-attack : In this thread UltraFish can not find concrete evidence of the offender ddosing. Therefor he bans him for alt evasion??? What? Ballpark has joined steam on 2015 (https://steamrep.com/profiles/76561198219316095), therefor I am certain he wouldn't be alting. So again rather than close the thread for no evidence on "ddos", he creates a random reason to ban the person with no evidence.
For this instance specifically, I was also involved. Fish and I looked into the account and with Mono's help, we found more than enough evidence to prove alt evasion, so he was banned. This can easily be made public, it is in Fish's chat between he and I if anyone would like, I can dig it up.
https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/Thr...king--8771 in this thread, a player gets banned for being 'twitchty'. Rather than ask for first person view, to 100% verify if he is hacking or not. Ultrafish bans him with minimum (at best) evidence. The offender does not have a Vac ban, and seemingly plays legit.
Just because someone lacks a vac ban doesn't mean they're innocent. In the second video, the aim lock is highly evident, and that is enough for a ban. Aimlock is a hack, and is against our rules.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZM2fnIH...e=youtu.be
You can see it several times in the video, one of the most evident is when the player line goes to the book, and back off several times relocking. You need to educate yourself on hacks more if you think this isn't one.
https://www.dinklebergsgmod.com/site/Thr...OM-Hacking : Here we see Ultrafish making stuff up again with "alt accounts", yet fails to post any proof of the offender using an alt. 
"Player has been banned for hacking. Duration - permanent, well at least until he shows up with another alt." Here he implys that he will continue to ban more innocent people on his genius 'assumptions'
I have asked this staff member to make his videos public again so that I may also go over this evidence so I ask for your patience on this one.
There are also various other threads where people get banned for somehow causing lag to the server, and they get banned for the reason of hacking? 
Ultrafish also results to kicking alive players in prophunt with the reason "test" because of the random hiccups or server instability that the server might have, as seen in the ballpark thread.
He also banned me for alting, where I have posted an unban thread. I clearly showed enough evidence that my 'account' is not an alt. 
 
I need to have proof of this please, if you have screenshots, it is needed. As for your evidence in comparison to the evidence fish and I shared for this, your count is absolutely 100% an alt account. I believe fish is going to share all that here for all to see, don't worry.

He is just a hostile and rude person that needs to go to therapy and get his life in order. He constantly disrespects players with his annoymous 'test' kicks on players and when the players return, he tells them it was a test. You couldn't wait till they were dead?
He bans players on lack of evidence as showed above and when his childish behavior can not find a good enough ban reason, he calls the offenders "alts'. Alt of who exactly?? You can't be bothered to post the original Steam ID of the presumed 'alts'?

When making ban requests, abuse reports, etc, I highly do not recommend putting the people down that you're trying to make a report on. Be mature about it first and foremost. If you have proof of these test kicks, it's needed otherwise it's just your word against his.


Other: