12-23-2019, 08:01 AM
Aight aight, I'll explain what I meant with each paragraph then.
1st paragraph, quite less seriously toned, meant to call him out for his quite redicilous "Joke" callouts on specific people, if the tone of the post is serious, the entire thing tends to get taken seriously. Not a lot of room for such type of jokes huh? Although I will agree the quote of me stating that the Trusteds were "Utter Trash" was actually over the top, and the callout of that one was fair.
The second paragraph, was an assessment of the situation described, while adding in how I think it went down.
Third paragraph, I never specificly mentioned that the OP said it was abuse. I merely questioned during writing that why there are little to no active abuse reports if the Trusteds are so slay happy, as it comes off to me as they also occasionally slay unjust. The main reason I could think of was that people think a mistake is not malicious abuse, therefore not going to write an abuse report that makes it sound the slay was added with malicious intent. So I tried defusing "Abuse" and promote the idea of posting there if people making posts there if they think they've been wronged by either Donors, all the way to the admins use of commands/powers.
Last bit was a closing statement with a second time writing how untastefull I find it to call out people like it was done in the original post. Mind you, as this was written pretty much as a abuse report but not in the correct sub forum, I decided to tackle this AS an abuse report. Make of it what you want, but I fail to see how I was much more toxic then the original poster.
1st paragraph, quite less seriously toned, meant to call him out for his quite redicilous "Joke" callouts on specific people, if the tone of the post is serious, the entire thing tends to get taken seriously. Not a lot of room for such type of jokes huh? Although I will agree the quote of me stating that the Trusteds were "Utter Trash" was actually over the top, and the callout of that one was fair.
The second paragraph, was an assessment of the situation described, while adding in how I think it went down.
Third paragraph, I never specificly mentioned that the OP said it was abuse. I merely questioned during writing that why there are little to no active abuse reports if the Trusteds are so slay happy, as it comes off to me as they also occasionally slay unjust. The main reason I could think of was that people think a mistake is not malicious abuse, therefore not going to write an abuse report that makes it sound the slay was added with malicious intent. So I tried defusing "Abuse" and promote the idea of posting there if people making posts there if they think they've been wronged by either Donors, all the way to the admins use of commands/powers.
Last bit was a closing statement with a second time writing how untastefull I find it to call out people like it was done in the original post. Mind you, as this was written pretty much as a abuse report but not in the correct sub forum, I decided to tackle this AS an abuse report. Make of it what you want, but I fail to see how I was much more toxic then the original poster.
Resigned Staff since 03-26-2018.
