03-06-2020, 11:41 PM
Yes I do apologize for any confusion I may have caused. It was early and I was on mobile.
Crossfire is slayable if it is clearly not accidental. It is up to the staff handling the report at the time to determine if it's reasonable crossfire at the time. For that reason, crossfire tends to be a case-by-case basis. With no actual "ruling" on crossfire besides a sentence under "T-on-T RDM" I can understand the confusion. It be like that sometimes
From the Staff Guidelines under RDM/Attempted RDM
So yes, as you said. People are responsible for your bullets, however if you're jumping in front of gunfights expecting to get someone slain you will be disappointing. With T-on-T it is far easier to know where your teammates are considering there is a large floating T above their head, hence why it is slayable more often than not in that case (unless it is a "jumping in front of a bullet" situation).
Crossfire is slayable if it is clearly not accidental. It is up to the staff handling the report at the time to determine if it's reasonable crossfire at the time. For that reason, crossfire tends to be a case-by-case basis. With no actual "ruling" on crossfire besides a sentence under "T-on-T RDM" I can understand the confusion. It be like that sometimes
From the Staff Guidelines under RDM/Attempted RDM
Quote:Please ensure the damage is not a result of accidental crossfire or stray bullets when enforcing RDM or Attempted RDM.
So yes, as you said. People are responsible for your bullets, however if you're jumping in front of gunfights expecting to get someone slain you will be disappointing. With T-on-T it is far easier to know where your teammates are considering there is a large floating T above their head, hence why it is slayable more often than not in that case (unless it is a "jumping in front of a bullet" situation).
![[Image: b_560x95.png]](http://cache.gametracker.com/player/Nicol%20Bolas/64.94.238.145:27015/b_560x95.png)
