05-25-2020, 12:52 AM
(05-25-2020, 12:49 AM)dong Wrote:I'm saying that dinkleberg could have made a full explanation of the ban, yet chose to wait a long period of time causing people to make assumptions(05-25-2020, 12:45 AM)Artyum Wrote: I'm sorry you are in such need of attention that you get mad at dislikes, the way this event with ginger was handled was complete garbage. You are calling people which you have ZERO idea of who they are "Pedo Sympathizers". Clearly you dont understand the concept of a fair trial. Let me explain a portion, There are two sides, in this case those who know what is going on, have proof, and want punishment, and those who have little idea, and LOVE to make harmful assumptions. <-- you, NEVER assume peoples motives.Complete garbage? The community ban was 100% justified and warranted, we don't want that type of person in our community. I wouldn't defend my own blood if they pulled a stunt like that man. I do agree with you saying some people don't know it all, but the proof presented at the beginning of this thread explains all that needs to be said. There are no two sides to this though honestly, there was an overwhelming amount of evidence that isn't even presented here for reasons Avi stated. It was going on for far too long, that was the trial.