05-25-2020, 01:00 AM
Right it wasn't addressed by Dink right away except for a response he made to another thread. Which it didn't feel like it really explained the circumstances behind the ban other than what she did was illegal. There are things that can't be explained, and most of the current administration had no idea the circumstances behind things and there were some things that CANT be shared publicly to them. So yes, the ones that knew were not current administration (or had resigned recently) and it was left to Dink to address. We were trying to figure out how to address it without disclosing certain things for people's safety but it got rushed by someone that shouldn't have done so.
Noot Noot ~(^-^)~
