Posts: 1,136
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
07-20-2020, 10:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2020, 10:23 PM by Penguinslayer4. Edited 1 time in total.)
I do believe those who were encouraging it (LingLing and KingFutureSauce) should get warnings as well tbh.
Posts: 1,136
Threads: 92
Joined: Oct 2017
(07-20-2020, 10:23 PM)Foxka oops Wrote: perhaps, but that is not my call
Yeah. I believe that, if they are going to start cracking down on rule bending, they need to also crack down on those encouraging the trolls/rule benders. Could stop a lot of the issues before they become ban worthy. Just an idea
Posts: 100
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation:
97
+1 should be a perma based on the
guidelines. He had 5 warnings for it within a quick span of time.
Test Moderator on Dinkleberg's TTT.
"You guys are fucking cancer."
Posts: 842
Threads: 109
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
1,228
07-20-2020, 10:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2020, 10:52 PM by Noire ♜. Edited 2 times in total.)
If we want to stick to the guidelines that we preach, he shouldn't be permabanned. He shouldn't have been allowed to get up to five warnings within such a short time. He should have been karmabanned before he reached 5 warnings. I'm not standing by and saying that you should totally be allowed to say the N-Word on the server but if we want to preach consistancy so much then, we cannot permaban this dude for ineptitude on our staff's part. The guidelines state that after the third warning. The third. The player should receive a day ban, he should've been Karmabanned after his third warning and a ban request should have been made for his three warnings. Instead, it looks to me as though staff didn't do their job and a player, while being actively malicious, is being overpunished for it.
We can't just let something slide to get a higher tier punishment, that's fucked.
+1 on a three-day ban for being actively malicious after being warned 5 times.
![[Image: 76561198079899620.png]](http://www.steamsignature.com/card/0/76561198079899620.png)
Lex
Dad Joke Connoisseur
Vinyl & Blu-Ray Collector Man
A-1 Saxophonist
Challenger Eve, Cass & Singed Player
Ex-TTT & Discord Moderator
Posts: 100
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation:
97
(07-20-2020, 10:50 PM)Noire Wrote: If we want to stick to the guidelines that we preach, he shouldn't be permabanned. He shouldn't have been allowed to get up to five warnings within such a short time. He should have been karmabanned before he reached 5 warnings. I'm not standing by and saying that you should totally be allowed to say the N-Word on the server but if we want to preach consistancy so much then, we cannot permaban this dude for ineptitude on our staff's part. The guidelines state that after the third warning. The third. The player should receive a day ban, he should've been Karmabanned after his third warning and a ban request should have been made for his three warnings. Instead, it looks to me as though staff didn't do their job and a player, while being actively malicious, is being overpunished for it.
We can't just let something slide to get a higher tier punishment, that's fucked.
+1 on a three-day ban for being actively malicious after being warned 5 times.
I would usually wait a bit before accusing other staff members of "letting something slide to get a higher tier punishment" but you do you. I understand where you're coming from about he should have been punished before he got to 5 warnings, I even messaged the staff on to let them know about that. I will say that arguing that he shouldn't be punished differently cuz we missed the original punishment then recommending a non-standard punishment seems counter-productive.
Test Moderator on Dinkleberg's TTT.
"You guys are fucking cancer."
