Posts: 1,112
Threads: 143
Joined: Dec 2018
Reputation:
701
Rowan you claim this to be respectful in some way but this is more childish than you are trying to make foxka out to be.
You always act childish like this over every single rdm. Then you go immedietly to blame the staff for the decision they, THE STAFF make. You can't keep trying to fight the staff, Act like a young kid, and fight people about metas.
You can serve a 3-day ban without throwing such a fit, theres always another map. Another round.
Posts: 17
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
-10
(05-01-2024, 11:44 PM)slater Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:39 PM)Rowan383 Wrote:
(05-01-2024, 11:38 PM)slater Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:32 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:29 PM)slater Wrote: I did read it lol So then why did you reply implying that this was a post about a wrongful slay when I have no issue with the moderation decision? cause it's pretty funny common generalization theme that happens with staff abuse reports dinks. But it doesn't really work as a joke in this thread? Either you have a strange sense of humor or you didn't read my post. That's cause this thread is a joke.
Also, here's that flaming/trolling warn description you were asking for. https://imgur.com/a/wnc39nu
Here's the link to the guidelines if you want to read them or not. https://docs.google.com/document/d/14lyJ...skblnitkuj Thank you for the links, they confirm that I did not "Flame" or "Troll."
Again, the evidence clearly shows I ceased interaction once I had my answer, proving that my purpose here was to get an explanation, which does not match the definitions in the rules you linked me.
Posts: 1,938
Threads: 106
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation:
2,261
(05-01-2024, 11:46 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:42 PM)Nicol Bolas Wrote: Snip I'm not angry, if anything it's funny to watch an entire community fail to make any good points.
You misunderstand, I don't care about making good points. I don't need to. I just like making fun of you for being a loser.
But whatever helps you sleep at night. Enjoy the ban as I doubt it'll be your last.
Posts: 17
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
-10
05-01-2024, 11:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2024, 11:51 PM by Rowan383. Edited 1 time in total.)
(05-01-2024, 11:47 PM)Deer-ly Wrote: Rowan you claim this to be respectful in some way but this is more childish than you are trying to make foxka out to be.
You always act childish like this over every single rdm. Then you go immedietly to blame the staff for the decision they, THE STAFF make. You can't keep trying to fight the staff, Act like a young kid, and fight people about metas.
You can serve a 3-day ban without throwing such a fit, theres always another map. Another round. And yet another reply that completely fails to make any good points in response to what I've said.
"You always act childish like this over every single rdm"
Let's pull up the records, I'm sure there's a way to see. Almost all report decisions made by moderators concerning me go almost entirely undisputed.
When I do dispute posts I am usually either right, or wrong and completely accept the explanation and move on.
Posts: 976
Threads: 55
Joined: Feb 2022
Reputation:
1,932
(05-01-2024, 11:48 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:44 PM)slater Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:39 PM)Rowan383 Wrote:
Thank you for the links, they confirm that I did not "Flame" or "Troll."
Again, the evidence clearly shows I ceased interaction once I had my answer, proving that my purpose here was to get an explanation, which does not match the definitions in the rules you linked me.
Posts: 17
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
-10
(05-01-2024, 11:50 PM)slater Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:48 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:44 PM)slater Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:39 PM)Rowan383 Wrote:
Thank you for the links, they confirm that I did not "Flame" or "Troll."
Again, the evidence clearly shows I ceased interaction once I had my answer, proving that my purpose here was to get an explanation, which does not match the definitions in the rules you linked me. Yet another comment that fails to provide an actual reasonable response.
Posts: 976
Threads: 55
Joined: Feb 2022
Reputation:
1,932
(05-01-2024, 11:51 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: Yet another comment that fails to provide an actual reasonable response.
Posts: 1,112
Threads: 143
Joined: Dec 2018
Reputation:
701
(05-01-2024, 11:50 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:47 PM)Deer-ly Wrote: Rowan you claim this to be respectful in some way but this is more childish than you are trying to make foxka out to be.
You always act childish like this over every single rdm. Then you go immedietly to blame the staff for the decision they, THE STAFF make. You can't keep trying to fight the staff, Act like a young kid, and fight people about metas.
You can serve a 3-day ban without throwing such a fit, theres always another map. Another round. And yet another reply that completely fails to make any good points in response to what I've said.
"You always act childish like this over every single rdm"
Let's pull up the records, I'm sure there's a way to see. Almost all report decisions made by moderators concerning me go almost entirely undisputed.
When I do dispute posts I am usually either right, or wrong and completely accept the explanation and move on. Because there is no point, there is no gist. This is just complaining. I really suggest you read the rules about overtime if this was such a confusing kill for you.
Posts: 17
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
-10
(05-01-2024, 11:54 PM)Deer-ly Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:50 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:47 PM)Deer-ly Wrote: Rowan you claim this to be respectful in some way but this is more childish than you are trying to make foxka out to be.
You always act childish like this over every single rdm. Then you go immedietly to blame the staff for the decision they, THE STAFF make. You can't keep trying to fight the staff, Act like a young kid, and fight people about metas.
You can serve a 3-day ban without throwing such a fit, theres always another map. Another round. And yet another reply that completely fails to make any good points in response to what I've said.
"You always act childish like this over every single rdm"
Let's pull up the records, I'm sure there's a way to see. Almost all report decisions made by moderators concerning me go almost entirely undisputed.
When I do dispute posts I am usually either right, or wrong and completely accept the explanation and move on. Because there is no point, there is no gist. This is just complaining. I really suggest you read the rules about overtime if this was such a confusing kill for you. I'm afraid you just aren't reading my post.
"overtime if this was such a confusing kill for you."
Had you read the post, you'd know that this was not a remotely confusing kill to me.
Posts: 678
Threads: 55
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
1,361
(05-01-2024, 11:50 PM)Rowan383 Wrote: (05-01-2024, 11:47 PM)Deer-ly Wrote: Rowan you claim this to be respectful in some way but this is more childish than you are trying to make foxka out to be.
You always act childish like this over every single rdm. Then you go immedietly to blame the staff for the decision they, THE STAFF make. You can't keep trying to fight the staff, Act like a young kid, and fight people about metas.
You can serve a 3-day ban without throwing such a fit, theres always another map. Another round. And yet another reply that completely fails to make any good points in response to what I've said.
"You always act childish like this over every single rdm"
Let's pull up the records, I'm sure there's a way to see. Almost all report decisions made by moderators concerning me go almost entirely undisputed.
When I do dispute posts I am usually either right, or wrong and completely accept the explanation and move on.
Going to chime in here, Damagelogs does not record reports or their decisions past the previous map. Also you do have quite the history of arguing slays, additionally you have a history of arguing over other punishments such as warns for Overly Sexual Conversations on server.
|