05-01-2024, 11:29 PM
(05-01-2024, 11:23 PM)Rowan383 Wrote:Your own evidence proves you were spamming him in psay which would fall under trolling rules. Being an annoyance to a staff member while they’re trying to carry out their duties falls well within those guidelines.(05-01-2024, 10:49 PM)Dildo Shwaggins Wrote: I don’t Format aside you claimed not to spam him and the only evidence to support any of your claims is you spamming him.Repeating a question 4 times over the span of a minute or so because I had reason to believe I was not being answered qualifies as "trolling/flaming?"
It’s a bold strategy Cotton, let’s see if it pays off for him
Trolling clearly implies bad faith, the fact that I stopped questioning after I had my answer proves it was in good faith.
Flaming is punishable if you're insulting someone and told to stop and fail to stop (correct me if I'm wrong).
Do any of you have any actual substantive reason that what I did qualifies as what Foxka accused me of?