[slater]

---

Had you actually bothered to read before forming an opinion, you would've seen the following:
"Let me be clear, the reason Foxka did not slay Deerly was absolutely valid, I have zero issue with his moderation decision there"

I did read it lol

So then why did you reply implying that this was a post about a wrongful slay when I have no issue with the moderation decision?

cause it's pretty funny common generalization theme that happens with staff abuse reports dinks.

But it doesn't really work as a joke in this thread? Either you have a strange sense of humor or you didn't read my post.

That's cause this thread is a joke. 

Also, here's that flaming/trolling warn description you were asking for. https://imgur.com/a/wnc39nu 
Here's the link to the guidelines if you want to read them or not. https://docs.google.com/document/d/14lyJ...skblnitkuj