[bunniey]

"the admins have unbanned so many no no peeps, so I should be as well"). 

I don't like how this was said. He said other people who did worse successfully appealed, so he should try as well, not so he should also just be unbanned. Those are vastly different statements, one assuming an outcome, and the other simply saying "Oh, if thing A happened, thing B is also a possibility"

Also, just to nitpick more, acknowledging someone is changing is fine. In an unban appeal, if someone brings up change, it can be assumed to be positive change just given the setting. And, very very very often, if someone talks about "how" they've changed or what steps they have been taking to change in their appeals, people accuse them of trying to play sympathy or manipulate people in other ways to get unbanned, usually that sort of thing is said in private but has been said on posts before as well. 



For the actual unban, I'd say unban at the 1 year mark on a short leash. I can attest to some positive changes made, he left the dinklecrew joker group discord server and that is the most positive change anyone can possibly make. RDM stuff is whatever, grapple exploits are whatever, bhop nothing, it's really just the slurs and evasion. A year is fine imo