01-03-2025, 01:47 PM
I waited a bit to reply to this but I'll put my two cents in now.
First of all, d33rly I am truly sorry that you had to experience something like this once again. We live in a very fucked up and awful world where this shit is common place and it's truly a terrible thing to go through not only once but twice.
Second of all, if the screenshots are found to be sufficient evidence I would like a community ban even if the accused isn't in the community really anymore. Evidence of both grooming and expression of continuously exploiting and even suggesting to put a backdoor into dink's is 100% grounds for a community ban.
Finally I just wanna talk about the "not a pedophile" because it has never sat right with me even if it is technically correct. Being technically correct isn't the best kind of correct in some cases, it just reads like we need to call them the correct title for their sake when it ultimately doesn't matter for them because we shouldn't have to accommodate for a groomer's feelings. In this case, not all of the evidence is posted and the connection of that account to the accused isn't made (which d33rly could easily prove to the admins and it's not their job to do for a community forum thread), I think that jumping to call the accused a pedo is a little much but considering how many pedophiles the community has dealt with, it makes sense that it happened.
Regardless I have confidence in the admin team that they will do their due diligence and give this situation a thorough investigation to the best of their ability.
First of all, d33rly I am truly sorry that you had to experience something like this once again. We live in a very fucked up and awful world where this shit is common place and it's truly a terrible thing to go through not only once but twice.
Second of all, if the screenshots are found to be sufficient evidence I would like a community ban even if the accused isn't in the community really anymore. Evidence of both grooming and expression of continuously exploiting and even suggesting to put a backdoor into dink's is 100% grounds for a community ban.
Finally I just wanna talk about the "not a pedophile" because it has never sat right with me even if it is technically correct. Being technically correct isn't the best kind of correct in some cases, it just reads like we need to call them the correct title for their sake when it ultimately doesn't matter for them because we shouldn't have to accommodate for a groomer's feelings. In this case, not all of the evidence is posted and the connection of that account to the accused isn't made (which d33rly could easily prove to the admins and it's not their job to do for a community forum thread), I think that jumping to call the accused a pedo is a little much but considering how many pedophiles the community has dealt with, it makes sense that it happened.
Regardless I have confidence in the admin team that they will do their due diligence and give this situation a thorough investigation to the best of their ability.
![[Image: 282891874ee974e1697479882d01166e1792682b.gifv]](https://64.media.tumblr.com/d7ee2cebe72c85b885e290bf042752d3/4f922f7fc99a5663-20/s540x810/282891874ee974e1697479882d01166e1792682b.gifv)
